Quantcast Spotify vs. Grooveshark vs. Pandora | The Danosphere.

The Danosphere.

Avatar

class TheDanosphere extends Dan implements Blog

Spotify vs. Grooveshark vs. Pandora

Streaming is quickly becoming the new way people consume music. Whether you want to listen to a specific song or discover music on-the-go music streaming services are the new go-to option for finding and listening to music. When it comes to streaming services there are many players, but 3 major names dominate the market: Grooveshark, Pandora, and Spotify.

There is a lot of misinformation flying around about which service is best, and what features each service offers, so I’m here to set the record straight. All information in this post applies to U.S. users only- beacuse I am in the U.S. I cannot accurately provide information on how these services do or don’t work in other countries. Another important note is that Spotify is not yet available in the U.S. (unless you use some trickery) but it is expected to launch in the U.S. within the next 3-6 momths.

Here is an infographic I put together outlining what each of these services have to offer. What prompted this was a post I read on  Gizmodo (one of my favorite tech/gadget blogs) “Why It’s Worth Getting Excited For Spotify’s US Launch”. In the post they ooh and ahh over Spotify as if it’s some kind of game changer- when in reality, there are already better services offering more features for less money that are already live and operational in the U.S.

Let’s see how these 3 streaming titans stack up:

I have used all 3 services first hand. Here are some of my personal thoughts on each service:

Spotify – Generally over hyped. No web client, extremely annoying audio ads for free users. I am in the U.S. so I was only able to use the desktop client, thus I cannot comment on the mobile client. Was unable to listen to several recently released songs because the service didn’t have them available yet and there is no “upload your own” option. Subscription is very expensive relative to other services.

Pandora – Awesome discovery feature which uses the music genome project. Annoying audio ads. No way to play songs on-demand. Web client is fair, it gets the job done, but also looks somewhat outdated like it was made in 2000. The service has at its heart custom “radio stations” that you create yourself. In a nutshell you choose a collection of music, either by artist(s), song(s) or genre(s). You can add as many as you like to a radio station and you can have as many radio stations as you like. Pandora will then use the music genome project to give you an endless playlist based on your selections, the results are pretty awesome and it’s a great way to effortlessly find new music. You can also like/dislike music as it plays to further refine your stations. Limitations for free users are pretty lame though (40hrs a month and limited skips).

Grooveshark – The service I actually decided to pay for when they finally released their iPhone app. Web, desktop and mobile clients (for paying users- free users get only the web client). All their clients are extremely current and robust, giving you the option to build playlists, like/dislike music, favorite music, and share music on any platform. All their clients are extremely consistent as well, and support all the same feature sets with very similar UIs so there is no need to relearn the product on different platforms. From what I gather most the music on Grooveshark is user-uploaded. This means that there can be duplicates and songs of questionable quality at times, but for the most part the music is very high quality. Their discovery service (aka Grooveshark Radio) is pretty cool too. Unlike Pandora it uses songs already in your playlist, and the data it has based on your like/dislike history to find new music for you. Paying users also get access to new features before the general public (think of it as google labs). Some of their latest new features are radio-by-tag and last.fm scrobbling.

So there you have it. Hopefully this puts to rest some of the misinformation swirling around these streaming services and provides you with a clear picture of what each service offer sso that, if you so choose, you can pay for the service that gives you the most bang for your buck. I chose Grooveshark and haven’t looked back. Happy streaming!

Share this post with friends:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr

Related Posts

  • Nick

    Great going. You decided to support the only illegal streaming site of the three. And guess what? Not one cent of the money you pay will ever reach the artists you listen to. But I guess such matters are unimportant to you.

    Also, your analysis of Spotify is probably the most shallow I've ever seen. But that is to be expected of a supporter of a service that is 6-7 times smaller than Spotify… despite Spotify only being available in six European countries. Grooveshark is available worldwide, an advantage of being illegal, and still not very popular for obvious reasons.

  • http://thedanosphere.com Dan

    Before you post asinine comments like this you should probably check your facts. Grooveshark is most definitely NOT illegal and they DO pay royalties to artists whose songs are on their service. They also have licensing deals with several major labels including EMI. Here is the full list of labels they have licensing deals with:

    http://www.grooveshark.com/labels-list

    How is my analysis of Spotify shallow? I judged them on the exact same credentials as Grooveshark and Pandora. I think what you mean to say is that their service offering is very shallow- so when compared to other music streaming services their offering looks very weak. Additionally you say Grooveshark is 6-7times smaller than Spotify? Where do you get that? According to compete.com it's the other way around:

    http://siteanalytics.compete.com/spotify.com+gr...

    Grooveshark is trending toward 1 million users while Spotify is struggling to crack 200k monthly users. Sounds like you are either very ignorant and misinformed or you work for Spotify. In either case I'm sorry your facts are so skewed but I hope the above reference material will help straighten out your maligned perspective.

  • martinprigby

    Unfortunately Nick is right – Grooveshark is not copyright compliant (not even on a 'fair use' basis).

  • http://thedanosphere.com Dan

    Upon further research it does seem that Grooveshark is swimming in a very gray area when it comes to copyright compliance. Grooveshark does not provide any music themselves, the music is actually uploaded by users and as such it is the users responsibility to make sure they are complying with whatever copyrights may be in place for the item which they are uploading.

    The users are actually LIABLE for any copyright infringement they commit in the process of uploading and/or selling copyrighted music on Grooveshark. So in that respect individual users could indeed use Grooveshark for “illegal” purposes. But I don't think the actions of a few individual users makes the entire Grooveshark product “illegal” as Nick claims. To Grooveshark's credit they also claim that:

    “Grooveshark states that they hold any money collected for any artist with whom they do not have an agreement in place in an escrow account.”

    So upon further review it does seem that there are some legal gray areas when it comes to Grooveshark but the legality or illegality of the music really rests in the hands of the users who have purchased and uploaded music to Grooveshark and how they choose to conduct themselves. I personally never purchase music on Grooveshark from an individual user, I always use Amazon.

    Here are some more details on the “legality” of Grooveshark: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_grooveshark.com_legal

  • Josef

    It's funny how the Spotify launch is always months away.

  • Josef

    Grooveshark does offer artist promotions. If you click Band Promos on their home page, you're taken to their artists site. I'd say that certainly is giving back to the artists.

  • ChappasUK

    Sorry I've tried looking through your article for the most important thing which, imo should be included in a comparison between music streaming services… the music. Nowhere did you mention what major artists / labels are included with each service, or even an approximation of how many songs each gives you access to.

    Tbh it seems like you were just comparing the clients of each and not the service themselves, which if this is the case you should've really stated that somewhere, especially as you're trying to 'set the record straight'.

  • Daniel

    That's mainly because grooveshark operates through its web-based client, while Spotify offers a dedicated program which users can download, therefore giving users no reason to come back to the site that often. I think it's not very reliable to judge the size of the user base through these stats.

  • Matt

    I had a similar experience and tried all three services a few weeks ago. I agree with you 100% I really like Grooveshark now that I have used it a lot. I am amazed I have gone away from Pandora.

    Here is my review. I admit, yours has the cool chart and mine does not thus trumping my article. :)

    http://cmstr.com/spotify-pandora-or-grooveshark...

  • Mark D

    Can someone tell me – if I become a Grooveshark VIP member can I install their desktop client on more than 1 PC?

  • matthewlking

    Yes, yes you can. You can install it on as many computers as you wish I think. I have it on my work PC and my home Mac.

  • Mark D

    Thanks Mathew

  • ron

    Right. According to wikipedia, Spotify now has about 7 million users while Grooveshark had about 1.2 million unique visitors last month. Considering many users stream GS on multiple computers (I stream it on more than 5 computers at the same time), spotify is much larger than GS in terms of user base. However, I do prefer the fact that you can use GS on multiple computers at the same time while spotify runs on only one computer simultaneously.

  • http://thedanosphere.com Dan

    Daniel brings up a good point, I'll admit. But Ron makes no sense in comparing “what Wikipedia states as spotify active users” to what grooveshark's website gets in terms of views.

    Grooveshark has an offline client, and a mobile client as well- much like spotify. So simply counting the “wikipedia claimed spotify users” vs grooveshark monthly website visits is far and away from an accurate comparison.

    To be truly accurate you would have to compare spotify active users vs grooveshark active users. But I don't think any of us can get our hands on that actual data.

  • http://www.tushark.com tushark

    Great blog post! I have been wanting to compare the three for a while, as I use all of them, and will in a blog post in the future, but I think you cover most of the bases pretty nicely here. I truly think Grooveshark is the future, but the problem is that Pandora is the “more legal” of the two right now. Spotify is not really an option for US users unless they're at least a bit tech-savvy.

  • taylor

    excellent post. one thing i noticed is you say Pandora lets you have unlimited stations, but they actually cap you at 100 stations (at least for free users). I've been really wanting to try Spotify because of all the hype, but I've been using Grooveshark for more than a year and it seems to trump what I hear Spotify offers.

  • http://sfaxication.co.nr/ barney stinson

    Actually, spotify has a 20hrs/mo limit for free users. Some tracks can't be found with spotify (like wish you were here – Pink Floyd !!) and others you have to pay for them… Grooveshark banner ads can be easily bypassed if you have Firefox. So yes, Grooveshark is the best choice.

  • Rylan

    You're right in that being a registered user does not mean that they are active. However, considering Spotify just reached over 500,000 paying subscribers (Over 7 million total users), it's a fair bet that's its active user base is substantially larger than Grooveshark, who in April had a user base (all users, not just paying subscribers) of around 400,000. That isn't to say Grooveshark isn't growing rapidly, because it is, just that it has nowhere near the popularity of Spotify.

    It really isn't a question which service is bigger, Pandora is by far the largest of the three you mentioned (over 6 million paying subscribers), and Grooveshark is definitely the the smallest. However, popularity by no means determines quality. I've used the Grooveshark service and I do think it is very well put together, with a very nice interface and tools. By far though, the major downfall is that it is based on user content, which brings with it a feeling of unprofessionalism and legal ambiguity. However, it is my understanding that Spotify is also based on user-generated content (I haven't tried Spotify as I am located in the U.S.).

    I would have a hard time envisioning a much more slick and user-friendly approach to a peer-to-peer streaming site than Grooveshark. However, I look forward to seeing development of services that (like Pandora) stream professional (instead of user-generated) content, only in an interactive format (unlike Pandora).

  • http://twitter.com/EarlVonTapia Earl Von Tapia

    Great article. Thanks for posting!

  • http://twitter.com/columbusgeek ColumbusGEEK

    I just uploaded all 50 gig of music to Grooveshark. IT went pretty quick as it scans your music for songs it already has and ignores it, much like Rdio does.
    I am getting more and more accustomed to Grooveshark. The only thing that bugs me right now is I cannot listen to my Pink Floyd stuff at all since it is on the blacklist. :(

  • shocker

    Except for the fact that if you listen to Pink Floyd on Grooveshark it's illegal since they don't have any license with Floyd. The same applies for Metallica, Led zeppelin, AC/DC, Red Hot Chili Peppers and probably more..

    It's just not right of Grooveshark to blame the people that upload this music, they shouldn't make it possible so people can't upload it. It's like giving someone a gun to kill someone and then tell the police: “Not my fault, he shot the guy”. Do you get my point? I hope people will understand as well as all those bands that don't want their music streamed. It will be on the internet either way.

    Why wouldn't bands publish their music streamed and get micropayments for it instead of people downloading it from p2p sites and sites like Grooveshark where you can get the music illegal for free eventually.

  • http://himenn.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/music-pandora-is-good-but-grooveshark-is-better/ Music: Pandora is good but Grooveshark is better | Himen Negandhi

    [...] also find a nice comparison, check it out spotify-vs-grooveshark-vs-pandora This entry was posted in Web scribbles and tagged grooveshark, music, pandora, web. Bookmark the [...]

  • Bodernai

    Social sharing Facebook and stuff is now possible on Spotify

  • Hoolu

    spotify rocks!
    easy use
    all* music,
    few adds (normal ur not paying anything for legal music)
    make ur own playlists

    *house music, techno… hasa lots of things, very admirable!

  • http://gamasgamas.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%8a-%d8%b4%d9%85%d8%a7%d9%8a%d9%8a-%d9%83%d9%87-%d8%a7%d9%87%d9%84-%d9%85%d9%88%d8%b3%d9%8a%d9%82%d9%8a-%d9%88-%d8%a7%d9%8a%d9%86%d8%aa% براي شمايي كه اهل موسيقي و اينترنت‌ايد «
  • http://www.omgykm.blogspot.com/ James Nixon Steel

    I like this article, I think I'm gonna move to Grooveshark after being with Spotify, it's cheaper & I want to make use of that price lock deal, while I can.

  • Jeebus

    Grooveshark is pretty awesome, but free Pandora is a nice way to get new music, and you don't have to pick our your list of songs. Grooveshark's radio button is pretty crappy in comparison. I use a bit of both.

  • freak

    exactly!

    spotify is completely overhyped. i mean it doesnt even have the beatles, come on! how crap is that
    don't like the grooveshark song duplication thing tho

  • Olle

    Spotify contains no user-generated content. You can add your local MP3 collection to your own Premium account playlists, but it's not available for others to listen to. That means you can add any songs that's not already available on Spotify, but don't have to worry about receiving bad quality user-generated content when streaming.

  • http://twitter.com/jennydb91 Jenny Dahl Bakken

    This could be new features, but Spotify lets you drag-and-drop your own songs into it, from iTunes, so you can make more complete playlists. And you can also share on facebook etc.

  • Wouter van Eekelen

    Grooveshark is not legal, hence shouldn't even be in this comparison. Grooveshark is simply P2P just like torrents. Spotify has social sharing and supports local tracks, so the comparison is wrong there as well.
    I never tried Pandora so I have no opinion about them.

    And yes, Spotify has annoying ads. Just pay a mere 5 euro/month for an unlimited amount of legal music and you don't have them.

  • hiddencam

    I agree with Jeebus. Pandora's music discovery is awesome. Pandora would be my choice if it only allowed music on demand, so I end up using Grooveshark as well. Pandora is when you just want to let good music run and not think about it, and Grooveshark is good when you find good songs on Pandora and you want to acquire and save the music. I really hope Grooveshark is legal and ideally it could someday merge with Pandora. It would be the ultimate streaming service.

  • hiddencam

    I was just listening to Chili Peppers yesterday on Grooveshark.

  • http://socialnomics.net/2011/01/11/spotify-still-not-in-u-s-why-not/ Spotify Still Not in U.S. – Why Not? | Socialnomics – Social Media Blog

    [...] streaming site that is similar to Spotify in many respects.  Below is a great graphic courtesy of The Danosphere that compares all three music [...]

  • J.S.

    not sure killing someone is relative to uploading songs that everybody knows already. now artists who havn't even released their stuff yet, different matter.

  • Asdfasdfasdfasdf

    I don't agree with your analogy. I was given a gun, I don't plan to shoot someone, but if I did, I don't see how that could be the fault of the person who gave me the gun. That is like saying, Dell gave you a computer, they should be responsible because you can use it for piracy. Their upload ability is for convenience and legal purposes, they can not be at fault if people use it for illegal purposes.

  • Frank

    Spotify does support social sharing and it does have a usage limit: 5 hours per week. I used it every day at my work, so that doesn't suffice for me. That, and the ads every three songs are annoying. Can't even mute them, Spotify detects this en pauses the ad,, come on. Blockify helps against this, to some degree, but that 5 hour limit is just killer. Grooveshark here I come.

  • http://reydan.livejournal.com/ reydan

    already have spotify account. will try grooveshark

  • Philip
  • http://kera.name/articles Tomalak Geret’kal

     The Beatles are completely overhyped.

  • http://kera.name/articles Tomalak Geret’kal

    >>  It’s like giving someone a gun to kill someone and then tell the police: “Not my fault, he shot the guy”. Do you get my point?

    Not really. That’s exactly how the law works in all western democracies.

  • Akshay

    Hey Dan, Awesome comparison. I wanted to know if you’d like to feature this post on mokabla.com – a project we’ve started to house all the best comparisons on the web under one roof! You can back-link to this original article of course. Check it out, and if you’re interested, I will send you an invite.Cheers,Akshay Arabolu, Founder

  • Jim

    I far prefer grooveshark because I can find specific tunes I am looking for and try them out.  If I like one song on an anime soundtrack, for example, and I want to hear the whole album – grooveshark is johnny on the spot.  I can also save playlists and launch into radio mode from one of my saved playlists.

    The legal grey areas are where grooveshark risks becoming betamax.  And it’s sad, because I buy more music because of grooveshark.  I bought about twenty tunes through iTunes store and/or amazon this past month purely because I found them and was able to listen to them in entirety on grooveshark.  No grooveshark – I don’t own those tunes.  Likely never would even have heard the songs or the bands involved.

    Artists need to wake up.  More people hearing your music is never, never, ever, bad.

  • Zap3001

    The release date is now in July so maybe it will happen next month.  I am still disappointed there is no ‘radio’ or ’similar song’ feature in Spotify like there is in Pandora or maybe I have not figured it out yet.

    I also am not sure I want to install Grooveshark if it is going to take all my local music and just outright share it with the rest of the Grooveshark world without giving me the option to pick what to share or not or opt out.  This also reminds me of LimeWire which was peer to peer file sharing and all the security nightmares of that even with the later versions.  How secure would my pc be? 

  • Zap3001

    I agree and don’t get the music industry.  They’re like a bunch of old people in a retirement home listening to LP records.  Have they a clue how these streaming tools will be a bonanza for the music industry.  Another example, are Ereaders.  I have bought more books using the Kindle then I ever did in my life (i really need to get a handle on that btw).  I still have no clue why Amazon is not jumping on this and create their own streaming player which would let me listen to music based on my likes and then just purchase it from there.  I am currently using DoubleTwist but it does not stream music or have a ‘radio’ or ’similar music’ feature.  Pandora’s IPO is nearly going underwater this morning so maybe investors just don’t get how these companies will make money.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=199704177 Tomalak Geret’kal

    Perversely, with the law the way it’s written at the moment (with copyright law being inappropriately applied to digital transfers), even if the record companies were happy to use the internet in this fashion for publicity, they actually *have* to be seen to actively police the distribution of their content. It’s nigh-on impossible to defend your IP if you don’t. So when someone starts selling knock-off merchandise on eBay, making hundreds of thousands of dollars, and you can’t do anything about it because you “allowed” people to copy the IP all over the internet anyway, you’re screwed. The solution here is to decouple digital transfer from copyright law and come up with new legislation to cover it… but, well, good luck with that.

    Related: http://kera.name/articles/2006/12/well-we-would-have-lost-244m/

  • http://kera.name/articles/2011/06/solution-for-entertainment-industry-is-in-law-after-all/ kera.name :: Articles » Solution For Entertainment Industry Is In Law After All

    [...] After All var addthis_product = 'wpp-252'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};A comment from a thread on Spotify/Pandora/Grooveshark: [I] don't get the music industry. They're [...]

  • Zeljko

    GrooveShark has 22 million song and 35 million registered users!

  • http://www.pocketfives.com/f13/spotify-coming-us-641987/#post6394418 Spotify coming to the US!

    [...] Minute Ago (7/6/2011 11:04pm) in reply to Jaybone2315 from the same article @ http://www.thedanosphere.com/2010/03…rk-vs-pandora/ Spotify – Generally over hyped. No web client, extremely annoying audio ads for free users. [...]

  • Masda

    Similar to Grooveshark:

    http://discoverbit.com/ 

  • Masda

    Similar to Grooveshark:

    http://discoverbit.com/ 

  • Carol

    I discovered Grooveshark a few months ago and cannot imagine any music service offering more or being better than it.  

    Loyal Grooveshark fan.

  • Carol

    Once you make up your playlists, playing music is endless.

  • Paul Roberts

    buy them on itunes they have an exclusive.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2SWOWZYGRQBXX2PSXZOAFWXVJ4 Kreatmagic

    Thanks for the review. I used Pandora for exactly 2 hrs and sent an email to delete my a/c. So not much to say about it. Without even trying, I could tell Spotify is, as you put it, just another over-hyped company just like SO many others have been and it pisses me off how come companies get so lucky with the support from the media and other users who just go with stuff coz of the hype, which these tech people generate. Even Google Music (although in its very early stages) isn’t even remotely close to Grooveshark. For all those people who claim Grooveshark is illegal, learn about the law first. 

  • John

    Might want to upload the chart. Spotify will upload any music on your computer, and does the social sharing. Thanks for putting the comparison together.

  • David

    It is legal, and even if it was not legal in the US, it is legal in many other countries but more than any other thing it is BETTER.
    P2P is a sharing protocol that has nothing to do with grooveshark since the files are stored in grooveshark servers. 
    Some people is blind because of what is legal or not…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=199704177 Tomalak Geret’kal

    Are you a lawyer? Perhaps a high court judge? I think you’ll find that even the courts haven’t set firm in case law whether this sort of thing lies on the legal side of the grey area.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=199704177 Tomalak Geret’kal

    A letter from Grooveshark claiming that they are legal is absolutely *not* authoritative proof that this is actually the case. Don’t be so naive.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=199704177 Tomalak Geret’kal

    God forbid that you should actually pay for something you use so much.

  • LOLz

    Shut the fuck up dickhead.  Nobody gives a fuck what you think.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=199704177 Tomalak Geret’kal

    Guess I hit a nerve.

  • http://bandpair.com/ Find New Music

    This is a great start. I will surely be looking towards any updates or upgrades. This can be truly revolutionizing!

  • Venerdi_99

    Yeah Yeah. Grooveshark’s legal blah blah.

    Digital distribution services send reports to artists stating EXACTLY how manytimes their music has been listened and therefore EXACTLY how much money they get according to their contract. On Spotify.

    EMI and some other major-record-company-manager shithead licensed usage of their music - on Grooveshark - indeed encouraging usage of an illegal service. Why? Because i can rename badly my files and call them “the SbSeatles” and NO money goes to the artist. And most importantly because if I’m not signed with EMI but with my “not-so-famous-record-company” i DON’T get a dime. Just because major companies protected THEMSELVES doesnt mean music is legal on grooveshark.

    It should be closed AT ONCE, it’s stealing users from legitimate music services.

  • http://twitter.com/ShantiKoti Shanti

    personally I think jampri.com beats them all if you want to create playlists with your friends. It uses youtube videos so open without invites and you need to use your facebook account details to signup, but it worth it big time. 

  • http://cityhallwarriors.com/ whats my house worth

    The first step to finding out “What is my home worth?” is to learn the different methods of

    determining the value. Some home owners choose to hire a professional appraiser to value their

    home. Although this will provide the owner with the value, it will also cost the owner anywhere

    from $400 – $700.

  • http://twitter.com/arothman arothman

    Grooveshark is most absolutely illegal. Spotify and Pandora play music that is supplied to them by the artists and/or publishers who own the recordings, and they track and pay royalties to the necessary parties. Grooveshark allows users to upload any audio they want to for any other user to listen to… that’s called sharing pirated files, and it’s still illegal.

    I’m sure Grooveshark offers the most content and flexibility to the
    listeners, and I can see why it’s the most appealing of the three services compared here, but they’re offering that convenience at the expense of the musicians you’re
    listening to. They’re hiding behind the DMCA, which says a site is
    not responsible for the actions of its users, so don’t be shocked when the
    RIAA comes knocking on your door for uploading your music library.
    Heck, the fact that you signed up as a user means it’s even easier for
    them to find you than it would be if you had been sharing the same songs
    using bittorrent.

    When I discovered a handful of my own tracks on their site and asked them why they were streaming my work without my consent their response was “sign up as an artist”. Basically when they get caught serving illegal files they don’t follow YouTube’s model of removing the content from the service… they actually have the audacity to suggest that the copyright holder sign up so they can take a cut of the proceeds!

    Use Grooveshark if you wish, but don’t think for a moment that you’re not breaking the law when you share music you didn’t record, or that you’re not stealing money from your favorite musicians when you play them on Grooveshark rather than a legitimate service.  They’ve got ’shark’ in their name because that’s exactly what they are.

  • Fire Mouse

    Grooveshark won the lawsuit so it isn’t illegal. Also, you can get a plus account by filling out surveys. I haven’t paid for Grooveshark at all but racked up 2 months, almost 3, or subscriptions in less than a month.

  • Hellfireblackfox

    Oh well. I guess I won’t be checking out your music then.

  • Venerdi_99

    Grooveshark doesn’t pay for its tracks unless someone threatens legal action. This is neither legal nor etic. Take my word - I work in a small record company – this is not legal music. And if you DON’T believe me, just ask ANYONE in the music business.

  • http://twitter.com/koffein666 Kristofer Markham

    Ive done a in dept test between the two.

    Check it out:

    http://www.noyas.net/2011/11/battle-of-titans-spotify-vs-grooveshark.html

    This is only part 1 though so stay tuned for part 2.

    // Kristofer

  • http://www.himenn.com/2010/09/music-pandora-is-good-but-grooveshark-is-better/ Music: Pandora is good but Grooveshark is better | Himen

    [...] I also find a nice comparison, check it out spotify-vs-grooveshark-vs-pandora [...]

  • Sebastian Pena

    hi, I just started using grooveshark but I get this annoying sounds, sort of beeps when I’m logged in…what is that?

  • http://eliogrieco.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/new-music/ New Music « Constantly Underwhelmed

    [...] Spotify vs. Grooveshark vs. Pandora Advertisement GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_bg", "fff"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_border", "eeeeee"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_text", "444444"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_link", "9c8a6a"); GA_googleAddAttr("theme_url", "9c8a6a"); GA_googleAddAttr("LangId", "1"); GA_googleAddAttr("Tag", "music"); GA_googleAddAttr("Tag", "grooveshark"); GA_googleAddAttr("Tag", "pandora"); GA_googleAddAttr("Tag", "spotify"); GA_googleFillSlot("wpcom_sharethrough"); Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Published: January 18, 2012 Filed Under: Music Tags: Grooveshark : Pandora : Spotify [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus

What's Here?